<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Day&#039;s Work &#187; Arbitration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?cat=3&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com</link>
	<description>Employment law, technology, politics... and maybe some baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:28:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ubisoft&#8217;s &#8220;Free&#8221; Offer to Assassin&#8217;s Creed Consumers Isn&#8217;t Actually &#8220;Free&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=103</link>
		<comments>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=103#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rhanafi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullshit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world of video games is a tumultuous one.  Video game releases look more like big budget movie releases these days, and in some cases they make even more money. So a big problem with a big video game release can be big trouble, and Ubisoft&#8217;s recent release of Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Unity has been nothing [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=103</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Reject Consumer Arbitration Clauses</title>
		<link>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=69</link>
		<comments>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=69#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rhanafi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I have previously blogged about, almost every single consumer contract with a big retailer or service provider includes a broad, sweeping waiver of your rights to a jury trial. Instead, these companies make you agree to arbitrate all disputes in a forum favorable to them. You have probably also waived your right to participate in a [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=69</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whither the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013?</title>
		<link>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=12</link>
		<comments>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rhanafi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration Fairness Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 7, 2013, Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) and  Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA) introduced S. 878, the &#8220;Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013.&#8221; It currently resides in the Senate Judiciary Committee, under the safekeeping of Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). The current political climate leaves him little choice but to stow it away, as it would [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacivilrightslaw.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=12</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
